🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed new appeals had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader claiming the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if negotiations reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his speech to the conference, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the strikes began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the ultimate solution to address disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this attack."