🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how little it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.